CO129-330 - Public Offices - 1905 — Page 449

7

?

unfor

70 Tras

I should think

Some Dept

in 7.0. is ignorant of the

discussion going

to

the functions of

Mor Cap

quite clear

57A

consuls

а

7.

4/4

The only thing that seems

is that the question

て

making shortages from the men's allowanc Can't be left in abeyance, the the and o

he was.

We showed have dry better tound 976, when its pist came in, to 6.0. daging kit it afternsthan been

adresses Boom in ever.

Sezə Iond now send

the compuestos with Frears &

8.0.1.2.0. saging that as

·7

Trea

the

ain

-31135

Jos.

matter does not appear to concern a

the 5.2.8.

the Cot fork head

چي

begled if the Wad. w. quine the pagemart

que instruction

In Niblett

Srea

hase

ay

4 1514 ausly

the think fib

Japee

B

atome

HPL

-4/4

Sir: -

RINTER

C.0.

10787

Ard 4 APR 05

Rec

FOREIGN OFFICE,

OR US

Tastern 93

April

1905.

*1#

COLONIAL

OFFICE

442

I laid before the Marquess of Lansdowne your letter

9092/1905 of the 25th ultimo, 'respecting the hospital

charges to members of the crew of the Russian destroyer

"Burni" now interned at Hongkong.

I am directed to state, in reply, that Lord Lans-

downe concurs in the proposal of the Lords Commission-

ers of the Treasury that the Russian Consul at Hongkong

should be consulted as to whether the Russian Govern-

ment are prepared to accept as a charge against them

the full cost of the issues made to the men in hospital,

with or without stoppages from their money allowances.

I am however to call your attention to the letter

from this Office of September 6th, 1904 and to say

that Lord Lansdowne is of opinion that in view of the

circumstances the matter might be left in abeyance

pending the conclusion of the war, when the claim for

Under Secretary of State,

Colonial Office.

+ 11⁄2 3115--3-

the